Can Better Wi-Fi Equipment Fix a Network That Wasn't Planned Properly?
Something I find interesting about networking is that slow or unreliable Wi-Fi isn't always caused by the router itself. Sometimes the problem starts further back in the network.
For example, if the internet connection or backhaul link is already struggling to handle traffic,, upgrading the access point may not make a difference. The same goes for placement, wireless interference, or equipment that isn't suited to the environment.
I think it's worth looking at a few things before spending money on new hardware:
Is the internet connection providing enough capacity?
Are the wireless links and access points positioned properly?
Could interference be affecting the connection?
Is the network being monitored so problems can be identified early?
These points become more important when a network serves multiple users or covers a larger area.
I found this guide on network equipment useful as a reference for understanding how the core router, backhaul, access points, customer equipment, and power protection all fit together:
https://dev.to/juliaanderson/wisp-network-equipment-a-complete-deployment-guide
What do you usually check first when a Wi-Fi network is unreliable: the router, the access point placement, interference or the internet connection itself?